Last updated: August 6, 2003

[First Navy Jack flag]

Jason Keith Phillips, Ph.D., C.T.L.  President                           Residents for Smart Development     P.O. Box 121                               Chester Springs, PA  19421


KNOW THE ENEMY!

"Therefore, I say: Know your enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles, you will never be defeated. When you are ignorant of the enemy but know yourself, your chances of winning or losing are equal. If ignorant both of your enemy and of yourself, you are sure to be defeated in every battle."

The Art of War by Sun Tsu, 500 BC

Supervisor Ken Miller

Supervisor Clare Quinn

Toll Brothers

Pulte Homes

Marc Kaplan


SURPRISE! Developer Fails To Keep Promises Made During Application Process, Say Residents in East Caln Township...

Daily Local News 08/05/03


"We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields, and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!" 

Winston Churchill


What YOU  Can Do...

Print Out, Sign, & Mail our Petition

Request a "WHY?" Yard Sign


JOIN RESIDENTS FOR SMART DEVELOPMENT!  

(It's FREE and Your Information will be Kept Strictly Confidential!)


THE FUTURE OF WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP?

 
Allied Groups

Brandywine Defense Coalition: Stop The Cornog Quarry Water Grab

Citizens for West Pikeland's Future, Inc.

The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund

Ludwig's Corner Horseshow Association

PennEnvironment

Pickering Hunt Club

-------------------------------------

Flyer Archive

RSD Flyer Vol 3 No 3

CSD FACT SHEET #1

Election 2002 RSD Flyer

Election 2002 CSD Flyer

CSD Public Meeting Flyer: August 2002

CSD Flyer: August 2002

CSD Flyer: September 2002

RSD Flyer 1: July 2002

-------------------------------------

Newspaper Article Archive

The Philadelphia Inquirer

August 14, 2002

 Daily Local News

September 1, 2002

November 15, 2002

November 16, 2002

December 4, 2002

March 1, 2003

-------------------------------------

Lancaster County News

Lancaster New Era 

February 7, 2003

-------------------------------------

Residents-First.comTM

Residents for Smart DevelopmentTM

A Nonprofit Corporation

ARCHIVED INFORMATION

SOME DISTURBING INFORMATION ON WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR KENNETH MILLER

 



Tuesday, May 20th is Election Day!

Just a reminder to please get out and vote on Tuesday, May 20th between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm. As all of us share a common concern for preserving open space and restoring rationality to the land development process, I would ask that all of you vote for the following individuals who share our concerns and who will work to achieve our common goals (unlike many of their opponents whose commitment to open space and rational development are dubious at best).

If you live in Chester County and are a REPUBLICAN, please vote for:

SANDY MOSER for County Commissioner (Although you can vote for two of the three Republican candidates, ONLY vote for Sandy as the two candidates with the most votes win)

If you live in Chester County and are a DEMOCRAT, please vote for:

ANDREW DINNIMAN for County Commissioner

If you live in West Vincent Township and are a REPUBLICAN, please vote for:

BOB FRYE for West Vincent Township Supervisor 

If you live in West Vincent Township and are a DEMOCRAT, please vote for:

DAVE GREENE for West Vincent Township Supervisor

Finally, if you live in West Pikeland Township and are a REPUBLICAN, please vote for:

ERNEST "ERNIE" HOLLING for West Pikeland Township Supervisor

Thanks to all of you for your continued support over the past year. Please remember to vote on Tuesday – in this election, EVERY VOTE REALLY DOES COUNT!!!!!!


Only Two Groups Want Mega-Apartment Complexes in West Vincent Township...

...The West Vincent Township Local Government and Those Who Work For Developer David Della Porta...

Who is Looking Out for the Health, Safety, and Welfare of Township Residents?

>> CLICK on Sign for Background Information  <<

>> See Below for Current Updates <<

Update - March 20, 2003

West Vincent Local Government Continues to Facilitate David Della Porta's Plans To Build a Mega-Apartment Complex Despite Overwhelming Resident Opposition

On March 20, 2003, the Planning Commission continued to ignore residents and opted to continue their customization of Township zoning ordinances to benefit developers.  This came as no great surprise to any of the residents in attendance as each Planning Commission member is hand-picked by the Supervisors and at least one owes his position on the Planning Commission to his work to elect Clare Quinn as Supervisor. 

To review what occurred at the public hearing on March 2nd, the Planning Commission agreed to consider only the following four changes despite intense public opposition to the Tier V ordinance:

  • making Tier V a conditional use,

  • not increasing the maximum allowed height for apartment buildings (keep at 35 feet),

  • take out some of the language as to what roads would qualify for Tier V-type development, and

  • buildings to have pitched roofs rather than flat ones.

But, at their regular meeting on March 20th, the Planning Commission refused to recommend the key change that would have allowed direct resident input into the development process for these mega-apartment complexes.  [It is interesting to note that in West Vincent Township, residents are prevented by their so-called "representative" government from even having the input allowed residents in Upper Uwchlan Township, one of the most over-developed townships in the region.]  By refusing to recommend the requirement to make apartment complexes a conditional use, the West Vincent Township local government continues their agenda of stripping away the rights of residents to have real and direct input into what happens in their community.  Basically, in West Vincent Township, if a developer can strike a deal with the Supervisors, the needs and desires of residents are irrelevant -- all thanks to our current officials.

But, there was even more good news for some our local government officials.  Namely, the interests of some of the Planning Commission  members and Supervisors were well-served by the Planning Commission's decision on March 20th  -- despite the harm caused to the majority of residents.  By limiting where mega-apartment complexes may be built to just the Route 100 and Route 401 corridors, Planning Commission Member Peter Rodgers  and Supervisor Ken Miller (both of whom live on Horseshoe Trail - one of the more heavily traveled roads in the Township and thereby one that could have been classified in the future to allow these apartments) no longer have to worry that an apartment complex will be located near their properties.  Also, Supervisor Clare Quinn also has reason to celebrate as she lives on Davis Lane directly adjacent to Ken Miller.  And finally, let us not forget Planning Commission Member Jean Warrick (who lives at the corner of Birchrun Rd and Horseshoe Trail) who not only will directly benefit from the recommendations she voted to adopt on March 20th, but who also benefits from Della Porta's plan to build his apartment complex as far away from her property as possible.  

So please feel free to call each of the Planning Commission Members and thank them for putting their interests ahead of those of the vast majority of residents:

James Wendelgass
Chairman
2495 Malehorn Road
Chester Springs, PA 19425
610-458-0174

H. Wheeler Aman
P.O. Box 118
Kimberton, PA 19442
610-933-5451

Vincent Kling, Jr.
1259 Birchrun Road
Chester Springs, PA 19425
610-469-0440

Jean Warrick
874 Birchrun Road
Chester Springs, PA 19425
610-469-9725

Peter Rodgers
2800 Horseshoe Trail
Chester Springs, PA 19425
610-469-4648

Ken Miller, Board of Supervisors liaison
2573 Horseshoe Trail
Chester Springs, PA 19425
610-827-1603

[As Planning Commission Members are basically appointed for life (their terms are simply renewed by the Supervisors unless a member dies or resigns), I haven't included when their respective terms in office expire.  By simply extending the terms of current Planning Commission members regardless of whether other Township residents want to serve, the Supervisors' agenda is benefited by excluding anyone who has a different point of view.  In fact, when two "outsiders" (the term used by some in the West Vincent Township local government to refer to those who oppose their agenda) recently applied for two open spots on the Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors quickly passed a resolution reducing the size of the Planning Commission from seven to five members.]

Update - March 2, 2003

Residents Express Anger at Planning Commission Meeting Over Supervisors' Scheme to Force Tier V on West Vincent Township -- Also, How Everyone in Northern Chester County Loses Because of the Supervisors' "Let's Make a Deal" Attitude Toward Land Development

During a three hour meeting on Thursday, February 27, residents of West Vincent Township (as well as others from throughout northern Chester County) expressed their outrage at the Supervisors' irrational insistence on forcing unnecessary high-density apartments on residents solely for the benefit of a single developer, David Della Porta.  Their anger was clearly evident as NOT A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IN THE AUDIENCE VOICED SUPPORT FOR THE SUPERVISORS' TIER V SCHEME!  

Also, just how "out of touch" the Supervisors are with the expectations and wants of their constituents was evident when, at the conclusion of the meeting and after listening to over three hours of residents voicing their opposition to her plan, Supervisor Clare Quinn continued to ignore the obvious and complained to a Township employee that the group attending the meeting "simply wasn't representative."

Before discussing the highlights of the meeting, let's look what the Supervisors' "wheelin' and dealin'" attitude toward land development is going to cost all of us if the Supervisors don't wake up and come to their senses.  Originally, Developer David Della Porta only wanted to:

  • build 87 single family homes, 

  • preserve the original farm buildings on the Griffith tract, and

  • preserve 91.5 acres of open space (total).

Had it not been for the West Vincent Township Supervisors, Della Porta's original plan would have been approved and NONE OF US WOULD BE FORCED INTO OPPOSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GRIFFITH TRACT.  But this plan wasn't good enough for the Supervisors.  Whether it was due to ignorance or egos out of control, we'll never know for sure.  But at least the Supervisors' deal-making benefited residents -- right?  WRONG!

Solely due to the insistence of the West Vincent Township Supervisors, David Della Porta came back with two additional plans -- one that would re-distribute the 87 single family homes and one for 216 apartments.  Incredibly, the Supervisors wanted the apartments.  So, under the developers new proposal, we got the following:

  • 216 apartments,

  • preservation of the original farm buildings on the Griffith tract, 

  • the probable loss of the Ludwig's Corner Horse Show Grounds (33 acres) because of the Supervisors' lust for Della Porta's apartment plan, and

  • 12 additional acres of open space (103.5 acres total).

Not a very good deal, but the "real deal" is even worse.  Because of the Supervisors' scheming, David Della Porta was able to sell 15.674 acres (called the Niederweiser tract) that was included and would have been preserved under his original plan.  But now, because of the Supervisors, another developer will be able to build on this land.  So now, we have a developer named Joseph Piccone proposing 8 houses on this tract of land.  So, once again, because of the West Vincent Township Supervisors, residents are confronted with even more development.  In conclusion, here's what we are left with:

Della Porta's Original Plan:

  • build 87 single family homes, 

  • preserve the original farm buildings on the Griffith tract, and 

  • preserve 91.5 acres of open space (total).

The Supervisors' "Improved" Plan:

  • the probable loss of the Ludwig's Corner Horse Show Grounds (33 acres of open space) because of the Supervisors lust for Della Porta's apartment plan,

  • 216 apartments,

  • between 8 and 11 single family homes on Niederweiser tract

  • preservation of the original farm buildings on the Griffith tract, and

  • 12 additional acres of open space (103.5 acres total).

Why would any rational government official advocate such an irrational and dangerous course of action against the wishes of their constituents??????

And now, some highlights of the February 27 Planning Commission Meeting: 

  • Bob Frye of Citizens for Sensible Development (CSD) started the comment portion of the meeting when he provided the following summary of why Tier V should NOT be included in the West Vincent Township ordinance and warned the members of the Planning Commission that adopting Tier V will open the Township to rampant, unnecessary development.

He also reminded the members of the Planning Commission about the genesis of Tier V.  Specifically, he stated:

"When I think about the 1998 ordinance and all the processes you went through to create the '98 ordinance...and I mentioned before that a lot of work went into creating the [1998 ordinance]...We would not be sitting here if it were not for David Della Porta and the Griffith property.  We would not be sitting here talking about 45' high buildings if that's not what David Della Porta wanted to build on the Griffith property.  The Griffith property, at best, is a poor piece of property to develop.  Every one of the five proposals that were made to the Griffith family were for single family homes.  However, in the wisdom of the Township Supervisors, they said 'Let's put everything on the west side of the town[ship] and how do we write an ordinance that will allow us to do that' -- that's the genesis of Tier V.  It was not created because somebody sat down and said 'Let's carefully think about how we want to prevent lawsuits in the future -- how do we want to create an ordinance that allows  for the proper development of multi-family apartments of the proper height that are reasonable for the Township.'  That's not the way this got created -- this got created because we were reactive to something -- as opposed to being proactive.  We created Tier V...you created...people created Tier V to serve one developer on one piece of property and now we're applying that same development right to a whole bunch of different potential properties in the township and I think that's just an abominable thing to do.  That's not really good planning..."

After his comments, Mr. Frye received a round of applause from the audience.

 

  • Dunwoody (Woody) Zook, a member of the Board of the Ludwig's Corner Horse Show Grounds Association (who was at the meeting to represent the Horse Show Association), stated that if Tier V is passed, the Horse Show Association will be forced to re-evaluate their plans for preserving the show grounds.  Specifically, he stated that:

"...One of our primary goals is to try to preserve our 33 acres of open space in this Township.  If this Township believes it is in their best interest to impose this Tier V, it's not only going to affect West Vincent, it's going to affect everybody else including the Horse Show Association and it's going to make us rethink what our goals are and if we're going to want to stay in West Vincent.  We are very opposed to this and so are all of our members..."

[The Horse Show Grounds have been a fixture in West Vincent Township for nearly sixty years.]

Are You Going to Allow the West Vincent Township Supervisors to Take This Important Part of Our Community Away From Us Forever? 

Is Tier V Really Worth It?

  • Henry Osborn, a Supervisor in East Nantmeal Township, pointed out to the members of the Planning Commission that the apartment complexes  encouraged by Tier V will result in even more apartment complexes as surrounding landowners are left with no other option but to develop their land in a similar manner.  He also correctly stated that surrounding landowners would be left with no other option but to build apartments because most individuals buying single family homes don't want 50' tall apartment buildings towering over their homes.  He also questioned why the ordinance was needed when parts of West Vincent Township are already zoned for apartments.  Finally, he stated that that any additional "open space" supposedly provided by Tier V was, in fact, a farce because by tripling the density, much of that open space will be consumed by sewage spray fields and sludge lagoons.

 

  • Martin Blumenthal of Saint Matthews Road in West Vincent Township told the members of the Planning Commission:

"...But I also think that you need to have some guts...I keep hearing about [from you] that you might be sued...The people of this Township don't want Tier V -- why do you think everyone is here tonight?  I've lived in this Township for fifty years...We had subdivision ordinances and zoning here before any of our surrounding townships -- we were a leader in trying to preserve this Township.  What you're doing here with this plan is knocking all that hard work of all these years down the drain and I'm appalled..."

After his comments, Mr. Liventhal received a round of applause from the audience.

 

  • Jody Dinnell of Black Horse Road stated the following in response to James Wendelgass' continued attempt to defend Tier V by stating that it was "consistent with the Township's Tier zoning system":

"Just to say that Tier V is consistent with the Tier approach doesn't make it right -- doesn't mean it is the right thing to do... So, you know, that just doesn't really say anything -- that it's consistent so we must be going down the right path...I don't see how that's enhancing the community...

You're not really gaining anything that's going to enhance people's lives..."

Ms. Dinnell's comments also apparently resulted in the members of the Planning Commission finally being able to grasp the merits of the "conditional use" process if they must force Tier V on West Vincent Township... 

 

  • Dave Greene of West Vincent Township asked "What does Tier V get us [the Township]?"  

This question went unanswered by the members of the Planning Commission...

 

  • Anne Winn of Prizer Road told the board that their proposed plan to only provide two parking spaces per apartment unit would be woefully inadequate.  She also provided an excellent example (using the island of Bali) to show that 50' high apartments would severely and irreparably damage the rural character of the Township.

 

  • The members of the Planning Commission claimed time and again that a large part of their rationale for wanting Tier V was to lessen the probability of the Township being sued in the future by a developer.  But, when Jason Phillips (RSD) of Black Horse Road asked Fronefield Crawford, the Planning Commission's attorney, what had made him decide that Tier V was now necessary after he had said that the Township's 1998 Ordinance fully complied with state law, Mr. Crawford stated that "he hadn't looked at the 1998 materials recently."  If that is the case, the Township doesn't even know what their actual current level of risk is and is just making a guess as to the need for Tier V.

 

  • The audience voiced considerable concern about placing 50' apartment buildings on top of the ridgeline behind the Ludwigs Corner Fire Company (the Township considers halfway up a sloped roof to be the "height" of a building for ordinance purposes -- Tier V increases this allowable height to 45' so any apartment buildings would really be 50' tall).  

 

  • In response to Planning Commission member Peter Rodgers' repeated statements (throughout the meeting) that the opposition to Tier V is just a "backyard issue," resident Jason Phillips pointed out that he lived farther away from the proposed apartment complex than Peter Rodgers and he opposed the Tier V ordinance.  Specifically, he said:

"...Characterizing this as just a backyard issue just doesn't work.  I actually live farther from it than you do and I'm against it -- and I'm sure you remember our "WHY?" signs before 200 of them were stolen by our opponents -- and they [the signs] went from Coatesville to West Chester to Pottstown to Phoenixville to Elverson --- this also isn't in their backyards as they're farther away than we are [and they're opposed to this as well] so I don't think that statement is really fair..."

He also asked the members of the Planning Commission to state their other reasons for Tier V (in addition to lawsuit buffer and clustering) -- the Commission members were unable to come up with any other reasons...

  • Resident Jason Phillips also asked why the Township was trying to adopt an ordinance that would produce development so inconsistent with what residents expected under the 1998 ordinance as the Township is currently involved in adopting regional planning.  That is, was it a lack of faith on the part of the Township with regard to regional zoning?

In response, Supervisor Clare Quinn stated that regional zoning would be in place within 15 months.  In response to this statement, several members of the Planning Commission expressed their belief that regional zoning is unrealistic and will never happen.  

So, it's time for Supervisor Quinn to put up or shut up.  For over two years, she has been promising residents that her efforts to foster "regional zoning" would soon bear fruit.  As any regional zoning would likely (and logically) push high-density developments (like those encouraged by Tier V) closer to towns like Phoenixville, THERE WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY NO NEED TO PASS AN ORDINANCE CONTAINING TIER V NOW.  

So, if Supervisor Quinn votes in favor of Tier V, she is telling residents that she has been less than truthful about her promises and progress in bringing regional zoning to West Vincent Township (and perhaps has been less than truthful about its benefits as well).   

 

  • In spite of the overwhelming opposition to Tier V, the Planning Commission only agreed to consider (and only consider) the following:

    • making Tier V a conditional use,

    • not increasing the maximum allowed height for apartment buildings (keep at 35 feet),

    • take out some of the language as to what roads would qualify for Tier V-type development, and

    • buildings to have pitched roofs rather than flat ones.

    Read the Daily Local News article...

    Email or call 610-321-0956 if you want to borrow a videotaped copy of the meeting

Update - Feb 24, 2003

WE WANT YOU

TO ATTEND THE WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP

PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27TH AT 7:30 p.m.

AT THE TOWNSHIP BUILDING IN BIRCHRUNVILLE

 

YOUR ATTENDANCE IS CRITICAL!

 

IF YOU DON’T ATTEND …

The West Vincent Township Supervisors and Planning

Commission Members will try to re-enact the Tier V Zoning

Ordinance for HIGH-DENSITY, four-story apartments...

 

Now is the Time to Make Your Voice Heard!

 

Update - Feb 10, 2003

Representative Government in West Vincent Township?  Not a Chance...

When asked why he was pushing for a high-density apartment complex on the Griffith property (a location prohibited by current zoning), this was Supervisor Ken Miller's reply (photo is his house):

 

What does it say about our local government officials when the only answer they have when their official actions are questioned is a childish "BECAUSE"?  If they are not protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the vast majority of their constituents, whose interests are they representing?

Update - Jan 13, 2003

A reply to one local resident's request for additional information:

Where is the apartment complex ( 216 unit) current building site?

The current proposed complex is targeted for the land directly behind the Ludwig's Corner Fire Company (between that building and the East Nantmeal Township Line).  Just so you know, I live on Black Horse Road (so I'm not all that close to the targeted site) but I am still adamantly opposed to this scheme by the Supervisors. One thing that is important to note is that the Township already meets all state requirements to provide for apartments in the Township -- so any claims that this action is necessary to meet state law are blatant lies.

Also, RSD/CSD would not even have to be involved in this fight if it wasn't for the Supervisors deciding to give a sweetheart deal to David Della Porta (initially, Della Porta wasn't even considering apartments but was "encouraged" to do so by our local government).  Finally, due to the actions of RSD/CSD, the Supervisors have the opportunity to walk away from this issue without fear of legal action by David Della Porta.

What is the timeframe the Supervisors have to "approve / deny" above building?

Due to our legal challenges, the complex could not be built until the appeals process is exhausted (1-2 years) and we are very likely to win our appeal of the Zoning Hearing Board's decision.  But solely to benefit the developer of the proposed apartment complex (David Della Porta), the Supervisors have decided to evade the legal process and essentially re-adopt the zoning ordinance to allow apartments in that location (as well as along Rt 401). Supervisor Clare Quinn is leading this attempt to circumvent the legal process through which RSD/CSD is working.

As a result, I would encourage you to attend a Planning Commission meeting in mid-February and a Supervisors' meeting (probably in mid-March) in order to actively oppose this attempt by the Supervisors to "cheat" and force apartment complexes on residents.

 Please check the Residents-First.com website for updates.

Specifically, what land "on or near Dewees Lane" is targeted for development?

In June 2002, the Supervisors passed an ordinance allowing apartments "on large parcels of land with frontage on PA Route 100 or 401." Although 100 acres are required for apartments, only a small amount of land next to either Route 100 or Route 401 would be necessary to meet the requirement to allow apartment complexes. For example, in an extreme case, a large piece of land a considerable distance from Route 100 or Route 401 could be used for apartments provided the developer owned a connecting piece of land the size of a driveway (say 50 feet wide) with either of the two aforementioned roads.

While I don't think any land is currently under active consideration for apartments near Dewees Lane, the large amount of open land near Dewees Lane makes it an ideal target for future high-density apartment complexes.  Due to the substantial financial benefit a developer would get from building an apartment complex versus single family homes, I can virtually guarantee that you'll get an apartment complex in the near future.

Since the Supervisors have little respect for citizen input, what is the next legal authority that would hear arguments from residents?

That is the really insidious thing about what the Supervisors are trying to do. They have made apartments along Route 401 or Route 100 a "by-right" option for developers. Basically that means that if a developer gets 100 acres of land together (either by buying a single parcel of land or by buying multiple parcels of land that touch one another or are separated by a road), agrees to leave a portion of the land "open," and meets some other minor requirements, the developer gains the right to build the apartments as soon as he submits his application to the Township. As a result, there is no "next legal authority" to hear resident appeals. Even if a group of residents went to the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, which is usually the next step, the developer will likely get the court to require the residents to put up a bond during the appeal so that whatever money the developer loses due to any delay will be returned to him because of his "vested right."  Also, any appeal by residents will FAIL because the courts will look at who conferred the right to build apartments to the developer (a duly elected local government) and will not take that right away from the developer.

So, as you can see, residents really have been sold out by our own Township Supervisors...

On whose authority can local government remove citizens rights to free speech / input on local issues that effect them?

As Township Supervisors are elected officials, they have the right to pass land development ordinances allowing for "by-right" options for developers.  While residents can still speak out against a given development plan, under our Supervisors plan what residents say is absolutely irrelevant because the Supervisors have guaranteed that the law will be on the developer's side. If the speech and input of residents will have absolutely no effect under any circumstances (under the Supervisors' plan for apartments even the Supervisors couldn't agree to meet resident demands), there is no doubt whatsoever that residents have been deprived of their rights.

Although there is no love lost between RSD and the Upper Uwchlan Township Supervisors, even in Upper Uwchlan Township such a development would at least require a "conditional use" process whereby the health, safety, and welfare of current residents could be protected at some minimum level.  The West Vincent Township Supervisors are prohibiting any such process or protections.  In is truly ironic that one of the Upper Uwchlan Township Supervisors has privately stated that the high-density apartments being advocated by the West Vincent Township Supervisors simply don't make sense in West Vincent Township.

 

In sum, it is just a matter of time before you and your neighbors face a new apartment complex.  I would recommend that you talk to your neighbors and join RSD/CSD in our efforts -- because if we lose, you will lose when apartments come to your neighborhood...

 

UPDATE - Jan 10, 2003

  1. West Vincent Township Supervisors Trying to Sneak New Apartment Ordinance by Residents

Although it is clear that the majority of Township residents oppose the Supervisors’ plan for apartments in West Vincent Township, the Supervisors continue to refuse to respect the wishes of their constituents or the legal process.  In their newest attempt to provide Developer David Della Porta with a profit windfall, the Supervisors have decided to try to “sneak” yet another apartment ordinance by residents by “re-adopting” the Township-wide Zoning Ordinance from 1998 with revisions allowing high-density apartment complexes.  This effort to circumvent the legal process for the benefit of a developer is being led by Supervisor Clare Quinn.

Make no mistake, our Supervisors are under absolutely no legal obligation to provide Developer David Della Porta with what can only be described as a “gift” — but are electing to do so in spite of fierce opposition from West Vincent Township residents and residents from throughout the region.

 

  1. Some Members of the West Vincent Township Government Try to Trick Residents By Masquerading as a Resident Group

In an unprecedented move, some members of the West Vincent Township local government tried during December 2002 to trick residents into believing that there was another resident group who actually supported the actions of the West Vincent Township Supervisors.  Calling themselves "SOS" (for "Support Our Supervisors"), they used severely biased information in an attempt to convince residents that a high-density apartment complex would actually benefit the Township.  (For more Information, See CSD Fact Sheet #1 in Flyer Archive)

 

  1. One Of Our Opponents Is Trying To Deprive Residents Of Their Right To Free Speech

Someone is trying to deprive residents of their right to free speech by entering private property and stealing "WHY?" signs.  This action simply reflects the extreme lengths some will go to in order to help developers at the expense of all Township residents.  To date, this individual has stolen in excess of 150 signs.  We have a description of this individual and are continuing to watch and wait so that we can catch him in the act.  Rest assured that when we catch him, we will prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law.

In contrast, the six or so signs put out by members of the West Vincent Township local government were never stolen and were actually taken care of by members of RSD/CSD before they finally succumbed to weathering. 

 

West Vincent Township Zoning Hearing Board Votes 2-2 on Procedural Challenge in Dubious Decision

[Nov 14, 2002] The West Vincent Township Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) voted 2-2 with regard to the RSD/CSD procedural challenge to the West Vincent Township Supervisors' ordinance that encourages a high-density apartment complex in the township.  What this means is that the "status quo" is preserved or that the vote was against our position.  But this "decision" was of very little surprise to the group given that:

  • The Zoning Hearing Board was hand-picked by the Board of Supervisors and was therefore was very likely to vote in the Supervisors' favor

  • One member of the Zoning Hearing Board (who recused himself) was one of the Supervisors who passed the ordinance we are battling to overthrow (so any board member voting in our favor would have to continue to interact with him after this is matter is eventually resolved)

So, at this preliminary stage, 2 votes in our favor really isn't bad.  And given that this is but a minor battle in what is likely to be a long war, this decision is of little import.  We are actively pursuing several courses of action and have a number of surprises planned for the both the Board of Supervisors and Developer David Della Porta.  And one thing definitely in our group's (and the law's) favor is that, after the Zoning Hearing Board, any appeals will be heard by judicial bodies that weren't appointed by the West Vincent Supervisors...

 

Distribution of Literature On Election Day a Success!

[Nov 5, 2002] On Election Day, members of Residents for Smart Development and Citizens for Sensible Development distributed literature to the over 1,300 registered voters who cast ballots in West Vincent Township.  This effort was an overwhelming success with only a handful of voters (most notably Sherman Perkins, husband of Supervisor Zoë Perkins) supporting the Township Supervisors' scheme to force a high-density apartment complex in West Vincent Township.  

Overall, voters are angry about yet another example of our supposedly "representative" Township government failing to represent anyone but themselves...the most common question we were asked by voters was "WHY are the Supervisors doing this?"

Special thanks to everyone who helped distribute literature in both West Vincent and East Nantmeal Townships and to all our new supporters who pledged to help us in our efforts.

 

Residents for Smart Development Membership Now Exceeds 500 Households!

[Oct 14, 2002]  This week, the total membership of Residents for Smart Development exceeded 500 households for the first time.  For some government officials at the local level, this should serve as notice that the rules have changed...   

...Their dirty little secret is out.  Throughout Chester County, the fact that some members of the local governments in our region are willing, and in some cases even eager, to "sell out" the majority of residents for their own benefit and the benefit of their cronies is no longer a secret...

The result: a well-informed, active public that knows that the statement "there's nothing we can do...it's the state's fault" is simply a convenient lie for self-serving, local government officials...

Fortunately, that which developers and self-serving township officials fear most has come to pass -- PEOPLE are joining together to restore rationality to land development in Chester County.  They are no longer the NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard) the opposition tries to paint them as in order to marginalize their preservation efforts -- instead, they are now what can only be termed NIABYs (Not In Anyone's Backyard)...

So let us continue to join together and take control of what is happening to our region before it is too late...

We must remain focused and remember that this is not the end but merely the beginning...


Mission: Accomplished!

What RSD Achieved in 

Upper Uwchlan Township


 

Get Involved!

Your involvement, when combined with that of other concerned citizens,
will decide the quality of life available where you live.  Together, we can make sure that our region's new motto isn't:

"All Hope Abandon,

Ye Who Enter Here"

Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)


What YOU Can Do...

Residents for Smart Development depends on the support of people who care about their community. We are fighting BIG MONEY people, who care only for increasing their wealth. This fight costs both time and money, but with the help of great people like you, we can win and WE WILL WIN!!!!

So please volunteer your time, request a "WHY?" yard sign, and/or send whatever contribution you can afford, large or small, to the following address:

Residents for Smart Development
P.O. Box 121
Chester Springs, PA  19425

Please E-Mail any comments to:
Email for Residents for Smart Development

©2002 Jason Keith Phillips