What You Can Do:

 

Some Additional Questions…

 

  1. WHY do the Supervisors seem so unconcerned with the likely damage to an exceptional value stream (and the work done by residents in the past to have the stream designated as such)?
  2. WHY were some of the Supervisors so angry when their plans were revealed to their constituents last October in Jason Phillips' election materials?
  3. WHY did the Supervisors, at all of their meetings, downplay the "apartment" ordinance prior to its passage on December 26?
  4. WHY did the West Vincent Township Supervisors ask the developer, David Della Porta, to help develop an ordinance to allow apartments?
  5. WHY did the West Vincent Township Supervisors pass the ordinance allowing apartments on           December 26 -- a meeting likely to be attended by few, if any, interested residents?
  6. WHY do the minutes for December 26 just happen to be missing from the Township's website?
  7. WHY didn't Clare Quinn, a member of the Planning Commission who worked on this ordinance and now one of our Supervisors, reveal the contents and existence of the "apartment" ordinance to residents in her election materials?
  8. WHY are the West Vincent Township Supervisors advocating a development that is so inconsistent with all of the other development in our region?
  9. WHY do the Supervisors dismiss concerned residents by stating that this is merely a "backyard issue" when so many residents who don't live near the proposed apartments oppose their construction?

WHY?

(Continued from page 1)

145%.  In other words, in return for a mere 12 additional acres of open space, the allowed density nearly triples to 216 units!!!  The Supervisors have yet to provide a rational answer for why they want to pursue such an obviously poor "deal."
What does this mean for all of us in the region?  It means:

  • The likely pollution of an exceptional value stream on the property.
  • An increase in traffic volume of at least 74% when compared to what the developer originally wanted to build.
  • More school age children than would have been the case if the developer was allowed to proceed with his original proposal (as calculated using U.S. Bureau of the Census data).
  • Overcrowding and a vast increase of the burden on public services.
  • Substantial tax deficit for Owen J. Roberts School District.
These are just a few of the many ways in which this project could impair your quality of life.
We are not anti-growth.  Like you, we understand that some growth is inevitable.  But we are against poorly planned, excessive growth, such as that embodied in this proposal being forced upon us by the West Vincent Township local government. 

We have been demanding hard answers from our local government officials about how this project will impact each facet of our quality of life for the past several months.  We have been so disappointed by the answers we've received so far that we are in the process of having our own experts research these questions.  Frankly, we know a lot about how this development will affect traffic and the environment.  But, we would like to have an equally thorough  understanding of how the project will affect our schools, property values, roads, well water, property tax rates, and a host of other quality of life issues.
We have adopted a strategy designed to encourage the Supervisors to follow the law and reconsider their support for this project.  Make no mistake, your family's quality of life will be irrevocably harmed if this proposal is approved.  If you always wanted to live someplace like Exton or King of Prussia, do nothing...  But if you value the aesthetics of the Township and want your children to have the same opportunity to enjoy what this region has to offer, call the West Vincent Township Supervisors and voice your opposition to this ill-conceived mega-development.

Page 2

CITIZENS FOR SENSIBLE DEVELOPMENT